Dead Man Walking
He was born in 1955.
He died in 1975.
But, on 30 July, 1976
he stood in front of the Lekhpal!
Was it a dead man
walking? As a ghost!?!
It was a cool and drizzly day on 30, July 1976. A
young farmer in his early twenties went to the tehsildar office at Azamgarh
District in Uttar Pradesh. He stood in front of the lekhpal (low-ranked
bureaucrat) and asked for his residence, caste and income certificates. He
needed these documents in order to apply for a loan at a bank against his
ancestral property at Khalidabad that belonged to his father. He needed the
loan to start a handloom business in his village named Amilo.
The young farmer said that he needed the proof of
identity of Lal Bihari of Amilo village in Azamgarh District. The lekhpal
looked at the man first and then at the village records of Amilo and said “Lal
Bihari died last year.” At first, the young farmer thought that the lekhpal was
joking. But then, the lekhpal showed a piece of paper which said that after the
death of Lal Bihari in 1975, his one bigha
(one-fifth of an acre) of land had been devolved to his uncle.
The young farmer turned pale for a few seconds, and
then filled with demonic rage and his eyes bloodshot, he thumped the desk and
thundered “I am Lal Bihari of Amilo.”
The lekhpal had the
fright of his life! Dead man walking? As a ghost!?!
For the next eighteen years, the young farmer, Lal Bihari
of Amilo, was pitted against the bureaucracy and officialdom trying to prove
that he was alive. But bureaucracy had documented his death. While the
officialdom wanted to contend that Bihari was “officially dead,” Bihari wanted
to establish that he was a walking (living) man wrongly “declared dead.”
What happened after
eighteen years is now history!
In the next eighteen years Lal Bihari learnt how
hard it was in the bureaucratic set-up of his land for an officially “declared
dead” individual to establish that he was wrongly “declared dead.” Bureaucracy
has trained itself to turn to blind eye or a deaf year to its own lapses.
Instead of acknowledging lapses, it sadly tries to cover-up lapses by projecting
falsehood as truth!
Lal Bihari, the common peasant versus the powerful
District Administration of Azamgarh. Real drama! Or, is it an epic?
One of the first things that Lal Bihari did was to
kidnap his nephew (brother’s son). Not being a seasoned kidnapper, Bihari did
not know what to do with his young victim. Therefore, everyday they went to
watch movies. The victim’s parents maintained a studied silence. A frustrated
Bihari smeared his nephew’s shirt with goat blood and sent it to his nephew’s
parents. If his nephew’s parents
would have registered a case against him then he could prove that he was alive.
Strangely, the nephew’s parents did not complain to the police station. The
kind-hearted kidnapper let go the child to his parent’s house.
Why Bihari kidnapped his
nephew and why his nephew’s parents did not lodge a complaint forms the
sub-plot of this drama!
Next, Lal Bihari arranged
for his own funeral and subsequently applied for a widow pension for his wife
hoping that the government would rectify the mistake upon seeing him alive. But
this theatrics was also in vain.
Bihari had to conjure
something big and glaring. At this point, he met a politician named Shyam Lal
who became his Guru. The guru advised the disciple to openly call (introduce)
himself as Mritak (deceased). The insane idea appealed Bihari so much that he
not only started introducing/addressing himself as Mritak (Late) Lal Bihari but
also started the Mritak Sangh, an association of the living declared dead. But
there was a problem. The association had only one member – Late Lal Bihari!
Bihari’s
story appeared in a regional newspaper called the Swatantra Bharat and the
article drew the attention of the local MLA who raised the issue in the UP
Assembly. Lal Bihari sat on a dharna
outside the Assembly in Lucknow. As the drama unfolded, Bihari got a visitor
pass to enter the assembly when it was in session. He heroically stood up in
the visitor’s gallery when his issue was under discussion and shouted “Mujhe Zinda Karo.” The Marshalls had him
thrown out of the assembly!
Two
extreme steps that Bihari took brought him into national focus. In 1989, he
sold his property to contest the Lok Sabha elections from Allahabad against
former Prime Minister V P Singh. When the results were declared Bihari himself
was surprised – the dead man had got 1600 votes! Lal Bihari had become a
national figure. In 1989, he thought of an even more outrageous idea. In 1989,
he first filed his nomination papers against Rajiv Gandhi in Amethi and then
promptly filed an application for countermanding the elections, as he (the
candidate) was dead. The election was not countermanded! But the tragic-comic
story of Lal Bihari attracted too much attention; much to the discomfiture of
the Azamgarh District Administration.
After 18
long years of struggle, finally, in 1994, Lal Bihari was declared alive by the
court! Today, Lal Bihari’s Mritak Sangh has 20000 members. The association
helps people like Bihari to seek justice who have been declared dead by the
family members in the lure of property.
Now we
come to the sub-plot this drama. How and why was Lal Bihari declared dead in
the first place? Therein lies the sub-plot filled with greed, treachery and
unscrupulousness. His own brother had bribed the tehsildar’s khatuni (record-keeper) to declare
Bihari dead on the official papers and transfer one-fifths of the land to them.
The kanungos, naib tehsildars and tehsildar are also in connivance. No
wonder, the brother’s family didn’t complain when Bihari kidnapped his nephew!
Today, Shyam Lal Kanojia, Panchu,
Deepchand, Ram Lallak, Paltan Yadav are all members of the Mritak Sangh. Like
Lal Bihari, they have all been wrongly declared dead due to treachery of their
own close relatives. Lal Bihari is fighting for them. His theatrics and
gimmicks are still intact. For instance,
he once convinced a blind person who was declared dead to contest the Lok Sabha
elections. “Andha kanoon ke liye andha umeedwar” (a blind candidate for the
blind law), he declared grandly!
Experience has taught
Bihari that it is easy to declare a living person dead. Experience has also
taught him that it is a staggering task for a living person to prove that he is
not dead!
Dear reader, the enormity
of the task accomplished by a simple village farmer is exactly what prevents us
from describing the life of Lal Bihari as a drama. In terms of its magnitude,
heroism, murky plots and sub-plots and its themes, the saga of Lal Bihari of
Amilo village is fit to be called an epic – a subaltern epic.
The dead man from Amilo is now walking, trying to raise more
“dead” people back to life!
Neethi
Acharya III BA
Comments
Post a Comment